Promptness

Archive for September, 2009

I have a program that says it was not installed correctly and needs to be reinstalled. Well I am running Vista Ultimate and have gone to the control panel and tried but it continues to not give me an option weather I can change or delete it. I tried manually deleting it but it still is registered when I tried to reinstall it. So I am stuck. I would like to either go into command prompt or dos and just delete for good but I don’t know how. Help?

Tweet This Post 

The delusion conceptually propounds that traders operate at a spontaneous FOREX market (as stipulated by B. Williams, A. Elder, E. Nayman, etc.). But it is not the case. Traders do their job inside a well-organized and controlled currency exchange market, governed by the Consortium of the world’s largest banks.

Hence, who is pushing the currencies up and down, who defines trends, corrective actions and flats?

And, who, ultimately, places a trend at a point, where the majority of traders are happy to think they have saddled the wave and are about to win an enormous profit! Now! Not to be scared! Not to close the position! Not to be satisfied with a minor profit! Later on we will discuss that sort of stupidity. Thus, one persists to continue long in spite of more and more degrading profit. Shortly, the loss starts growing with light velocity! Are you familiar with the situation?

Well, who has reversed the rate?

And who generally tugs currency rates?

Tugging is surely centralized. Compare on-line quotes of several Dealers or banks to find out that they are per second coincident. Do each bank’s traders act in such synchronism, that even not seeing each other, they place identical orders so that quotation is in 100% agreement? NOTHING IS A MIRACLE HERE!

But prior to further explanation, we will listen to Bill Williams, the FOREX scholar (Trading Chaos, Ch. 6): “…let us trace a trend formation process. Earlier, the market and the market trading venue did constitute a single physical space. Majority of large grain traders were concentrated on the “floor”. Their orders involved amounts, sufficient to move the market; they enjoyed better control over the market than at present. During the latest 20 years markets have grown worldwide. Now, not only “Purina Ralstone”, “Kellog” and other prominent commercial associations seek hedging their cash assets transactions. So do millions of the world’s minor profiteers and farmers, competing with them in anticipation of perspective grain price fluctuations? This fact also implies strong potential for traders with nowadays, trends not being constructed on the floor. The latter mainly ensures the market liquidity by way of tackling “outer orders”.

The fact, that today’s trends are formed rather “outside the floor” than “on the floor”, as before, enables one to trace further market tendencies with trade volume being the key thereto. Our only on-line information is restricted to tick volume, time and price. Tick volume constitutes a number of price changes per a certain time period. It is not at all a number of traded contracts. Multiple researches revealed no significant difference between actual and tick volume. Using a tick volume, we may suppose, that it represents actual volume. It is a real-time volume, thus being our key to what’s going on in “trading pits”.

Two basic elements are organic to FOREX trading: brokers on the floor and remote traders. Local brokers constitute staff, executing orders, thus earning their salaries and/or commissions. They don’t possess money to be at their disposal. They are order executors. Their prospects are not burdened by prices, they getting for the orders management.

Remote traders use their own money. They have to pay the price out of their own pockets, unless they are getting a good one. Traders have to be much superior in skill to brokers since they independently take their own decisions, while the broker’s job is to follow the others’ orders.

Remote traders are supposed to support the market by way of taking its opposite side. As a rule, they are not at all crazy about any long-term transactions. Quite a few remote traders have been participants to our private training programs, and it is to be admitted that a 10-minute long transaction may seem quite a long-term one for some of them.

Think back to the fact that trends are built up of orders, delivered to the floor from outside, but not of long-term positions entered by remote traders. Since the traders’ job is to take the side opposite to the orders arriving from outside, they have no prospects of trading in between themselves. They follow your money. We are emphasizing again, that tick volume is our key to understanding what’s going on in the Forex Market. Remote traders do not contribute any significant volume to trading, which might result from dealing with similar traders on the floor. Trends emerge from incoming orders. That is why we are to be certain about when and in what amount the outer order is supplied to the floor. It is presented via a tick volume change”.

So, we, traders, turn out to be price locomotives, don’t we? And brokers on the floor just allocate and execute order, incoming from us, don’t they? And on April, 1, 2005 they all (meaning: we all) together decided to swivel the trend and to stay short against all the rules, news and common sense… I wonder if the scholar ashamed or not?

As regards the above quotation, I have chanced to hear a single argument in favor of Bill Williams (I guess you understood for what sake I’ve cited it in detail): it all pertains to the futures markets; we neither read nor use the above at Forex. Strange enough, these are the arguments of Williams’s advocates, but not of Williams himself.

This book is actually intended for both: futures markets and Forex Market. That’s why pictures taken from both the markets are so mixed up and the author never differentiates between the Technical Analysis methods thereof. Thus, either the author does not trace any difference between the two markets, or he is not eager to reveal it to the reader.

And neither in the foreword, nor in the remarks did Williams and his publishers refer to the fact that something of “Trading Chaos” is inapplicable to FOREX, and thus should not be made use of by a trader at FOREX.

I have repeatedly come through this peculiarity of Williams (correct specific case method definition being extended to a wider coordinates scale) and it actually induced me to write this book. In all and all, the methods and advice, absolutely true and correct for a PART of Forex Market are claimed by Williams to be universal for the WHOLE of Forex Market without being demonstrated where the above is effective and where it isn’t.

The same is being done by Williams’s opponents and advocates, who visualize the portion of Forex where his methods are operable only. As different from analysts and Williams’s bibliographers, TRADERS require much stronger to realize a demarcation with pro-Williams trading to the one side thereof and with counter-Williams trading to the other one.

Logically there comes a question: what might be added to Williams’s indicators in order to turn them effective at the point where they are presently ineffective (see details in chapter on the Williams Alligator).

And now we are getting back to the issue of who supplies traders with FOREX rates quotation, bearing in mind that it’s us, traders, who exercise rates movement in accordance with Williams’s standpoint. Millions of traders have actually been studying FOREX by virtue of the “Trading House” and it is really worth studying. This is one of the most interesting and instructive editions whose repeated reading each time brings about something new and useful.

However, in some passages it smells being custom tailored. Is Williams ignorant of the fact that there is no single FOREX exchange and there’s no single trading venue or floor? And that Pacific, Asian, European and American session classification is arbitrary?

Did You see currency rates move, while there’s a day off in the USA with the banks closed? So did I. So, who has made up his mind in the USA to trade on the floor on a day off?

Then, who prompts rates, who formulates trends and turns them with no objective reason for the rate to swivel and to rush in a direction, not being requisite at all?

Here is the answer, as provided by No. 11, 2002 “FOREX Profiteer” magazine’s article by Nadezhda Larina “Electronic Broker Systems at FOREX market”, http://www.ifin.ru/publications/read/351.stm), reading: ”… an FOREX dealing “Electronic Broking Service (EBS)” enjoys wide popularity with the extra-exchange inter-bank FOREX market. It has been developed by the Consortium of largest FOREX trading participant banks in association with “Quotron” informatics expert company and launched in 1993. Presently EBS incorporates 13 world’s largest market-maker banks, viz,: BN AMRO Bank, Bank of America, Barclays Capital, Citibank, Commerzbank, Credit Suisse First Boston, HSBC Bank PLC, J.P. Morgan Chase and Co.Lehman Brothers, Royal Bank of Scotland, S-E Banken, UBS AG along with Japanese Minex Corp., established by a Consortium of Japanese Banks in a joint manner with KDD Japanese telecommunications company and Dow Jones Telerate.

EBS offers a completely integrated range of dealing services for the professional inter-bank market, being a leading anonymous inter-bank FOREX trading electronic dealer. It is currently used by over 2500 dealers in 850 world banks and yields a trade turnover of about USD80 billion daily.

See there also: “Three greatest FOREX dealers – Citibank, J.P. Morgan Chase and Deutsche Bank, together with Reuters Group PLC) have started Atriax system in June, 2001.The latter terminated the operations in spring, 2002 after having failed to stand the competition.

Can you imagine a monster machine, capable of forcing three world’s largest banks – Citibank, J.P. Morgan Chase and Deutsche Bank to abandon their business plans! Or capable of reversing the EURUSD from 1.3660 to 1.1865 and thus instantaneously executing orders of all the world’s traders, going and standing short! And thus within, April-June, 2005, buying the EUR from traders at USD1.36, 1.29, 1.20, 1.19, etc.

Do you see the loss? Watching the EUR slip 1700 pts after having bought it at 1.36… But, possibly, there is no loss at all?

All of Larina’s basic provisions have actually found confirmation 2 years later in the UK “Financial Times” article by Jennifer Hughes: “A PC occupying trading floor” (see it on Financial Times 2004).

It underlines that during the precedent 2 years the Consortiums turnover has grown by extra daily USD20 billion thus currently stretching to USD100 billion, whereas the most prominent internet-based trading platforms ensure the average of USD15-20 billion daily turnover.

So, let’s jump to some conclusions:

1. The FOREX market is not the same as it used to be earlier, say 11 years ago.

2. There is in fact “a price fluctuation relative uniformity”, otherwise, practical quotations similarity with all the world’s brokers and traders.

3. The reason for the above uniformity has been honestly disclosed from technological standpoint, being the “flourish of electronic exchange technologies”.

4. There is no mention of other reasons for similar rates at absolutely different FOREX trading platforms the world over what links together the above platform and FOREX rates at them from financial, organizational, contractual viewpoints, etc).

5. The great interest is the remark from “Financial Times” reiterating the changes at FOREX during the latest years as narrated by an anonymous ex-dealer (?) who compares the FOREX market as of those 11 years ago: “It used to be a hell noisy and a hell splendid!”

In his opinion the market has lost a significant portion of its individuality with rise of technology. A very interesting phrase: “It used to be a hell splendid”. I would add:” It used to be a hell volatile”, with reference to the fact that the daily rates travel went as far 400 to 500 pips. And there’s nothing of the kind now.

6. Now, why has “The Financial Times” only interviewed the EBS Consortium official?

J. Jeffrey and the currency transactions department director, Fabian Shey Why wasn’t it desirous to interview the Reuters representatives (UK)? What’s the reason for such kind of disrespect to the compatriots?

Or were they hard to be contacted in London, where The Financial Times and Reuters HQs are located, moreover after maintaining that presently both, EBS Consortium and Reuters are dominant at the inter-bank market? Or The Financial Times possesses enough information on compatriots from Reuters to hold that the EBS Consortium official’s interview is sufficient without any Reuters?

7. Please, pay attention to the following from The Financial Times: “Anyway, other opinions are available. According to Justin Trenner, the current volume of on-line trading is turnover amounts to USD100 billion daily with the steep growth observed”. The Financial Times thus turns out to recognize its complete inability to trace not only FOREX cash flows, but even the trading volumes at those platforms.

The principal difference between stocks and FOREX is, by the way, readily apparent from the above. Those, writing about similar Fundamental and Technical Analysis methods for both the markets, are either ignorant as to fundamental difference of these markets, or they are deliberately swindling millions of traders.

When pointing out, that, besides the above Banks Consortium, there exist other electronic dealing facilities (e.g. Electronic Broker Service, Reuters Dealing 2000-2, etc.), N. Larina has overlooked their interrelations aspect. And there are a lot of questions: how and why there is coincidence of trends, corrections, historical highs and lows in the course of a single day, etc.

And what is the way to reconcile the statement on shunt operation of EBS and Reuters Dealing facilities with the information that Citibank, J.P. Morgan Chase and Deutsche Bank together with Reuters Group Plc have failed to stand the competition? Is it attributable to the fact that the Consortium has actually acquired Reuters, maintaining its formal sovereignty in order to support traders’ opinion that FOREX market is free and independent? If affirmative, then it’s fairly clear why the Consortium was not scared to buy the EUR on its dip from 1.36 to 1.1860, since there nothing to be afraid of with one’s knowledge of the point, below which one will not drop the rate as well as the point to stage the EUR rally to in several months with no one to interfere with Your so doing.

Hopefully, it’s now understandable who swivels trends at FOREX! The world’s largest banks Consortium does have power to reverse rates, whenever desirous, overthrowing fundamental laws, news releases, trends and common sense, just the way we witnessed on 01.04.2005 charts. But it’s not at all, traders, as claimed by Williams.

That’s why there is obvious ineffectiveness of the Williams’s Market Facilitation Index (MFI) based on fluctuations of traded volumes; to be more precise, sometimes the indicator tells the truth, whereas sometimes it lies in a barefaced manner.

The reasons are stated above: the banks Consortium pushes rates to where it needs, but not to where traders going into deals, thus accumulating the volumes, indicated on the screen. That’s why traders turn losers when making use of the Williams’s MFI indicator.

Full text of this article and pictures of examples http://www.masterforex-v.su/

Tweet This Post 

I need to run scanreg /fix from the command prompt on a machine running me.
It is running in safe mode at present, how do I get it to restart with a command prompt?

Tweet This Post 

Participants in my product development seminar recently asked me for a brainstorming session to help them come up with creative names for information product packages – multiformat products and services that might include a manual, CDs, coaching or consulting and other items. Here are the questions I posed for this group, along with some examples illustrating product names that were developed from each idea.
1. What is the result your customers want?
* Lose Weight Before Bikini Season
* Finish Your First Marathon
* The Fame & Fortune Program
* Double Your Donor Base
2. Who are your customers?
* Fun Fundraising for Museums
* The Shy Person’s Guide to Networking
* Wanna Change the World? Social Entrepreneurship 101
* Self-Defense for Wimpy Women
3. What is the problem you solve?
* Coach Kids’ Soccer Even If You Never Played Yourself
* Kicking Procrastination Out of Your Life
* The “Home Depot’s Coming to Town” Survival Guide for Hardware Stores
* Home Study Challenges Solved
4. What do happy customers say?
* “We Built a House Ourselves!” The 10-Month Action Plan
* The “I Used to Be Fat” Course
* The People-Recognize-Me-Everywhere Publicity Program
* The “I’m Safe and I’m Strong” Self-Defense Method
5. What does your product particularly have or not have?
* The Lose Weight Eating Chocolate Plan
* The Earth-Friendly Lawn Care Guide
* The No-Discipline Method of Kicking Procrastination
* No-Rules Parenting
* Nonviolent Self-Defense
6. What’s the customer’s fondest fantasy?
* Getting Through Your Teen’s Years Still Sane
* The Tonight Show, Here You Come!
* Build a Four-Generation Family Business Dynasty
* Multi-millionaire by Your Tenth College Reunion
Take a look at the words and ideas generated from each brainstorming prompt, then combine, recombine and tweak them further, looking for an appealing succession of words that clicks with you and has great potential to do so as well with customers.
As with all brainstorming, be sure to suspend judgments while generating ideas – as many as you can.
Good luck with your product naming!

Tweet This Post 

I do not like my user on the computer and want to know if i can change it from the command prompt menu? If so, How?

Tweet This Post 

Are you a small business owner in search for a prestigious registered office address?

A registered office address is of paramount significance for a business. The Government agencies send all the official correspondence documents to the registered address of a company. Having an effective and renowned address for corporate communication plays a crucial role as it not only boosts up the image of the company among the public but also enables the company to display the registered office address on the public record, such as Companies House.

It is very essential that the valuable official correspondence documents are delivered to and received from the Government agencies on time. For this, it is essential for a company to provide an effective office address to facilitate prompt and reliable delivery and reception of such documents.

A registered office address service is particularly useful for smaller businesses/companies. Such companies include sole directors working from home who wish to have a separate, prestigious, registered office address to be displayed on the public record. This helps to draw more customers as well as facilitate reliable correspondence with the Government agencies.

Registered address service is also useful for UK companies owned by overseas residents. Such people need to get a registered company address in the UK to run their businesses and communicate with the Government agencies in the UK. In fact, it is mandatory for such companies from legal point of view to have a UK-registered address where official mail can be sent.

There are many companies in the UK that provide registered office address service to small businesses. The Government mails received by the company providing the service is forwarded to the corresponding client (the small company availing the service).

There are many companies who set the fee structure in such a way that is conducive for the small businesses. For example, there may be companies offering the registered office address service without charging any administration fee, mail forwarding fee and postage fee.

A careful selection of such a service will enable you bring efficiency in your business processes.

Tweet This Post 

Unplanned or unexpected expenses can knock your door at any time i.e. without giving any warning; every time it may not be possible that you are ready with finance to overcome the expenses. So, if you have funds to meet them, then well and good otherwise opt for same day cash loan for your financial aid. Same day cash loans are useful in borrowing money especially when you need it on the same day and have no time elasticity. Same day cash loans are small, short term loans that are there to meet the unexpected financial expenses.

Unplanned expenses like immediate repair of car, some urgent medical treatment, paying the school bill etc needs prompt solution to meet them. So, borrower can avail same day cash loans instantly as it don’t require any collateral against it with that it don’t acquire credit check.

Anyone who has minimum age of 18 years with the regular employment and income £1200 or above can apply for the same day cash loans. With that borrower must posses the active bank account for the cash transaction so that he can withdraw the money at the needed time.

With the same day cash loans borrower can avail the loan amount ranging as low as £100 to as high as £1000 for the repayment term option for the 14-31days. This amount can be extended up to £ 1500 depending upon the borrower’s income statement.

The best way to apply for the same day cash loans is through online mode. Online mode offers the borrower to fill in a simple online application form that requires just a few minutes to fill in. After filling the form and qualifying for the loan borrower can get the loan amount within the short duration of 24hours.

Same day cash loan help the borrower to meet his financial crises on same day when they need it.

Tweet This Post 

Is there away to send a message from my computer to my friends house using command prompt? I was told to do a net send type thing but will that even work? If so what is the command for it?

Tweet This Post 

I want to edit the properties of the window size of the command prompt window, but i want to do it using commands through command prompt itself. Please help

Tweet This Post 

Children at any time are either out of control, under control or in control.

Hopefully your children are not out of control but many parents think that they are successful if their children are under their control. This is a little scary because sooner or later kids will break out and rebel against overly strong authority – either that or they never grow up.

It is far better for children to be in control and learning to make decisions for themselves.

However, if your child is often out of control then it maybe necessary to get them under control before they can be in control.

Many parents are unsure about the whole decision-making process involving kids.

Here is a simple guide:

Consider all the choices, rules and activities that concern children and then allocate them to these three areas:

1. Parents Rule: these are decisions where there is no negotiation. E.g . going to school, young children’s bedtime

2. Work it out together: these are areas where you and your child negotiate outcomes. E.g. when to come home from an outing, TV programs.

3. Kids Decide: give your children full authority in some areas. E.g. choose the sport they play, school activities

As a child shows the ability to make sensible decisions consider allowing them more authority over their lives. This demonstrates your trust in them and your faith in their ability to make good decisions. It also promotes confidence in kids.

As a rule you will make most of the decisions for very young children. It is important that children experience the consequences of their decisions if they are to make responsible choices. So if kids decide to skip a meal then they can wait until the next meal before eating something substantial. This teaches them that their decisions have a result or a consequence.

The use of choices is one simple strategy that helps children make good decisions, however it is a hugely misunderstood concept. Offering children and young people choices doesn’t mean they can do whatever they want. Nor does it mean that you provide a smorgasboard of choices.

Wise parents will offer children two options– “Either play inside quietly or go outside if you wish to make a noise.” In some ways this offers the illusion of choice but some children need this sort of guidance to help them make smart decisions.

3 questions that promote better decision-making

Teenagers often make poor choices as they can’t see the long term consequences of their decisions. They often need some adult prompting to help them look ahead.

Encourage children and teenagers to consider their behaviour through the filter of these 3 questions:

1. Is the choice safe for me?

2. Is the choice fair to others?

3. Is the choice smart and in my long-term best interests?

You can use these questions to review teen behaviour that had poor outcomes so they can see where they went wrong.

Decision-making is hard work for parents as we are always treading a fine line between being too protective and not protecting children enough.

But if we want children to begin to make smart choices and be in control rather than out of or under control we need to equip them with knowledge and skills as well as opportunities to do so.

Tweet This Post